• 13850 CENTRAL AVE, CHINO CA
  • Help@evcube.net
  • Help@evcube.net

$0.00 0

Cart

No products in the cart.

BMW i5 vs Dodge Charger EV: U-Drag Showdown


Clash of Titans: The U-Drag Gauntlet

In an electrifying showdown, Edmunds recently staged one of its signature “U-Drag” races, pitting two formidable electric cars against each other: the all-new Dodge Charger EV Daytona Scat Pack and the sophisticated BMW i5 M60. While these vehicles cater to vastly different buyer demographics—one a modern interpretation of American muscle, the other a German luxury sport sedan—their on-paper specifications suggested a surprisingly close contest. This unique U-Drag race format, a true test of all-around performance, promised to reveal more than just straight-line speed.

The Edmunds U-Drag isn’t your typical quarter-mile sprint. It’s a comprehensive assessment involving a drag race to a 180-degree corner, followed by hard braking, navigating the turn, and then accelerating back to the starting line. This multifaceted challenge evaluates not only raw acceleration but also crucial braking capabilities and cornering agility, making it an ideal arena to compare these high-performance electric cars. The near-identical power-to-weight ratios of the Charger EV and BMW i5 set the stage for what Edmunds described as one of its closest and most exciting U-Drag races to date.

SpecificationBMW i5 M60Dodge Charger Daytona EV Scat Pack
Horsepower593 hp670 hp
Weight (approx.)5,230 lbs5,930+ lbs
Power-to-Weight Ratio (hp/lb)~0.1134 (Slightly higher)~0.1130
0-60 mph (Claimed)3.4 seconds3.3 seconds
Quarter Mile Time (Est.)~11.5 seconds~11.5 seconds

The Dodge Charger EV boasts a formidable 670 horsepower, overshadowing the BMW i5’s 593 hp. However, the BMW carries a significant weight advantage, tipping the scales at over 700 pounds less than the nearly 6,000-pound Dodge. This crucial difference gives the BMW a slight edge in horsepower per pound. While the Dodge claims a marginally quicker 0-60 mph time of 3.3 seconds (versus the BMW’s 3.4 seconds), both were anticipated to deliver nearly identical quarter-mile performances around the 11.5-second mark, highlighting just how closely matched these electric cars are on paper.


Dissecting the Duels: Performance Under Pressure

Across three intense runs, the BMW i5 M60 consistently emerged victorious, albeit by the narrowest of margins. The racing dynamics revealed fascinating insights into each car’s strengths. The German sedan demonstrated a knack for pulling away comfortably in the initial sprint, establishing and maintaining a lead before reaching the crucial corner. This initial advantage was complemented by slightly superior braking performance compared to the hefty Dodge Charger EV. As anticipated, the BMW also proved more adept through the corner, showcasing better poise and agility.

However, the drama didn’t end there. In a stunning display of raw power, the Dodge Charger EV consistently showcased superior acceleration from a roll. Despite the BMW being the first to exit the corner in all three runs, the Charger would unleash its might, rapidly closing the gap on the return leg. The second run was a nail-biter, nearly ending in a photo finish, with the Dodge almost nosing ahead. Had the return straight been slightly longer, the American muscle EV might have clinched a win. Both drivers utilized their vehicles’ respective boost modes for an extra surge of power post-corner, but the Dodge appeared to be the more ferocious straight-line machine once already in motion.

Performance AspectBMW i5 M60Dodge Charger Daytona EV Scat Pack
Initial Acceleration (to corner)Consistently StrongerSlightly Trailing
Braking PerformanceMarginally Better (still a heavy car)Challenged by weight
Cornering AgilitySuperior, hides heft wellMuscle car characteristics
Rolling Acceleration (post-corner)GoodExceptional, regains ground rapidly
Race Wins (out of 3)30 (but very close)

It’s important to note that both electric cars, despite their performance credentials, showed that stopping significant mass from high speed is a challenge. The BMW i5, weighing over 5,230 pounds, and the Dodge Charger EV, approaching 6,000 pounds, both struggled somewhat to scrub off speed effectively under hard braking, a common trait among powerful, heavy EVs.


Beyond the Finish Line: Character and Implications

The U-Drag race did more than just crown a narrow winner; it highlighted the distinct personalities of these two electric cars. Recent driving experiences with the Dodge Charger EV confirm its strengths: it’s visually striking and undeniably rapid in a straight line. However, its handling characteristics lean heavily into its muscle car heritage, which, in terms of agility and cornering finesse, isn’t always a compliment. It tends to feel its considerable weight in the turns.

Conversely, the BMW i5 M60 performs a kind of automotive alchemy. While also a substantial vehicle, it manages to mask its heft remarkably well, particularly through corners. It drives like a much smaller, more agile car, offering a blend of straight-line speed and dynamic composure that gives it an edge as an overall sporty package. This ability to feel nimble despite its size is a testament to BMW’s chassis engineering.

While neither vehicle excels in braking—a common challenge for performance-oriented electric cars due to their battery mass—the BMW’s more balanced approach to performance gives it a slight advantage. Looking ahead, if a head-to-head comparison were to involve the upcoming four-door electric Charger sedan, its likely additional weight could further tip the scales in favor of the BMW i5, particularly in tests like the demanding U-Drag race that penalize excess mass in braking and cornering phases.


Frequently Asked Questions


What is an Edmunds U-Drag race?

An Edmunds U-Drag race is a specialized performance test. It involves a traditional drag race, followed by hard braking into a 180-degree turn, and then accelerating back to the original start/finish line. This format tests a car’s acceleration, braking, and cornering abilities, offering a more comprehensive evaluation than a simple straight-line drag race.


Why was the BMW i5 M60 chosen to race against the Dodge Charger EV?

Despite targeting different buyers, the BMW i5 M60 and Dodge Charger EV Daytona Scat Pack have remarkably similar power-to-weight ratios and projected straight-line performance figures (like quarter-mile times). This makes them intriguing competitors for a comprehensive test like the U-Drag, which can highlight subtle differences in overall dynamic capabilities beyond raw power.


Which car is faster in a straight line?

It’s nuanced. The Dodge Charger EV has a slightly quicker claimed 0-60 mph time (3.3s vs. BMW’s 3.4s). However, in the U-Drag, the BMW i5 often pulled ahead initially. The Dodge showed superior rolling acceleration, especially after the corner, suggesting it might be quicker once already moving at speed. Both have similar estimated quarter-mile times.


How did the cars compare in braking and cornering?

The BMW i5 M60 demonstrated slightly better braking performance and was predictably superior through the corners, feeling more agile. The Dodge Charger EV, being heavier and tuned more like a traditional muscle car, struggled more with braking and wasn’t as composed in corners. Both electric cars found braking their considerable mass challenging.


Despite having less horsepower, how did the BMW i5 win the races?

The BMW i5’s victories, though narrow, can be attributed to several factors:

  • Lighter Weight: Being over 700 pounds lighter gave it a slight edge in power-to-weight ratio and significantly helped in braking and cornering.
  • Initial Acceleration: It consistently got a better start in the U-Drag.
  • Cornering Agility: Superior handling through the 180-degree turn allowed it to carry more speed or exit quicker.
  • Braking: Marginally better braking helped in setting up for the corner.

These combined to give it just enough of an advantage over the more powerful Dodge in the specific U-Drag format.


What are the key characteristics of the Dodge Charger EV’s handling?

The Dodge Charger EV is exceptionally fast in a straight line and has impressive rolling acceleration. However, its handling is described as being like a traditional muscle car. This means it can feel heavy and less agile in corners, not its strongest suit compared to more dynamically focused vehicles like the BMW i5.


What does this race tell us about the future of electric performance cars?

This race highlights that while straight-line speed is easily achievable with electric cars, managing weight for braking and handling remains a critical challenge. It also shows that different manufacturers are bringing their brand DNA into the EV era – Dodge with its muscle car feel and BMW with its focus on driving dynamics. The close competition indicates a very exciting future for high-performance EVs.


How would a four-door Dodge Charger EV compare against the BMW i5?

The article suggests that a four-door version of the Dodge Charger EV would likely be even heavier than the two-door Daytona Scat Pack model tested. This additional weight would probably further disadvantage it against the BMW i5 in terms of braking and cornering, potentially making the BMW an even stronger performer in a U-Drag scenario.

    Comments are closed

    Search

    Follow us

    Have any questions?

    • help@evcube.net
    • +1 (510)-878-5951
    level 2 ev charger charging at home,tesla charger for home charging

    Safe

    level 2 ev charger charging at home,tesla charger for home charging

    Speed

    level 2 ev charger charging at home,tesla charger for home charging

    Stylish

    level 2 ev charger charging at home,tesla charger for home charging

    Save

    level 2 ev charger charging at home,tesla charger for home charging

    Smart

    level 2 ev charger charging at home,tesla charger for home charging

    Suitablility

    Tesla Redesigns Doors for Emergency Safety

    Table of Contents 1. Introduction: Tesla's Door Handle Redesign 2. NHTSA Investigation and Safety Concerns 3. Details of the New Door Release Design 4. Global Regulatory Landscape 5. FAQ Introduction:…
    Read more

    Lyft Teams With Waymo to Catch Uber

    Table of Contents 1. Lyft's Pursuit of Autonomous Vehicles 2. The Waymo-Lyft Collaboration: A Game Changer? 3. Uber's Autonomous Driving Initiatives 4. Nashville as the Launchpad for Robotaxis 5. FAQ…
    Read more

    Hyundai’s 600-Mile EREV: 2027 Game Changer

    Table of Contents 1. Hyundai's Electrified Future: The 2027 EREV Launch 2. Understanding Extended Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) 3. Hyundai's Unique EREV Strategy and Genesis Expansion 4. EREVs in the…
    Read more

    Tesla Redesigns Doors for Emergency Safety

    Table of Contents 1. Introduction: Tesla's Door Dilemma 2. The Proposed Design Change: A Unified Approach 3. NHTSA Investigation and Regulatory Scrutiny 4. Global Impact and Future Solutions 5. FAQ…
    Read more

    BMW: Gas Engines Will Never Die

    Table of Contents 1. BMW's Dual-Track Strategy: EVs and Combustion Engines 2. Market Dynamics Driving BMW’s Decision 3. The Future of BMW Platforms: A Diverse Approach 4. FAQ 1. BMW's…
    Read more

    Tesla FSD vs NYC Chaos: Robotaxi Test

    Table of Contents 1. Introduction: The Tesla Robotaxi Challenge in NYC 2. Navigating NYC with Tesla's Full Self-Driving 3. Tesla's Vision-Based Autonomy vs. the Competition 4. FSD Beyond NYC: Suburban…
    Read more
    evcubnb level 2ev charer,tesla charger,home charger,50a charger,nema 14-50charger

    Any Charging Problem?
    Let Us Know 24/7

    • 13850 CENTRAL AVE, CHINO CA
    • help@evcube.net
    ©2022 EVCUBE - All rights reserved